View this post on Instagram
Lawyers of former President John Mahama have filed their closing addresses in the election petition as was ordered by the Supreme Court on Monday.
This means the way is cleared for the Supreme Court to decide on the Petition on March 4, 2021.
The closing addresses are the summary of all that have transpired in the course of the hearing and what each of the parties wanted as per their case before the court.
The Respondents, Electoral Commission and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo filed theirs on February 17, 2021.
Review motion dismissed
The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed former President John Mahama’s review application to reopen his case in the ongoing election petition trial.
The unanimous decision of the nine-member panel chaired by Justice Kwasi Anin Yebaoh held that the application is without merit.
This is the third review application from the Petitioner that has been dismissed.
Other members of the panel are Justice Yaw Appau, Justice Samuel Marful-Sau, Justice Nene Amegartcher, Justice Prof Nii Ashie Kotey, Justice Mariama Owusu, Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, Justice Amadu Tanko and Justice Henrietta Mensah Bonsu.
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
Featured Video
Lawyers for the 2020 NDC Presidential Candidate John Dramani Mahama say they have successfully proved that no candidate obtained more than 50% of the votes cast in the 2020 presidential elections. The question I am asking is that 'where and when did they proof it'? Maybe they did not Algebra in secondary school where you will be ask to proof that "this is equal to that" You have successfully proved that no candidate obtained more than 50% without figures? Let borrow Kweku Baako's words, go and tell this to the marines, it is only NDC foot soldiers who will believe you because many of them do not reason otherwise they will not go out there to demonstrate against EC. why were you worried about Jean Mensa not testify?